![]() ![]() ![]() Sadly, A Christmas Carol wasn’t the moneymaker that Dickens hoped it would be. Sales were good, but the publication costs had been high. ![]() There were issues with the color of the endpapers, the title page and the book binding.Ī Christmas Carol was the most successful book of the 1843 holiday season. By Christmas it sold six thousand copies and it continued to be popular into the new year. Since Dickens was paying for the publishing of the book, he wanted the book done his way. Chapman & Hall would be paid for the printing costs and receive a fixed commission on the number of copies sold. As a result, they proposed that A Christmas Carol be issued in an inexpensive collection of Dickens’s works or possibly as part of a new magazine.ĭickens was adamant that A Christmas Carol be published as a high-quality, stand-alone book.Īfter a discussion between the parties, they came to an unusual agreement.ĭickens would fund the publication of A Christmas Carol. The owners of the company began to lose faith in the marketability of Dickens’s work. ![]() Sales of Martin Chuzzlewit, also published by Chapman & Hall, had been much less than expected. However, in an interesting turn of events, Dickens paid the publishing costs himself. Technically speaking, A Christmas Carol was published by Chapman & Hall. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |